Sadd al-Dharai and Hukm
Sharii
Sadd al-Dharai (Blocking the means): Dharai (means)
is the plural of Dhariah which signify means. Sadd means 'to block'.
In Usul, it means 'blocking the means to evil'. Sadd al-Dharai is
often used when a lawful means is expected to produce an unlawful
result.
The concept of Sadd al-Dharai is founded on the idea
of prevention of evil before it materializes. There are examples of
Sadd al-Dharai in the Quran (for instance, 6:108 and 2:104). The 'means'
must conform to the 'ends' (objectives of Shariah) and 'ends' must
prevail over the 'means'. If the 'means' violate the purpose of Shariah,
these must be blocked. The purpose (Maqasid) of Shariah are
identifiable from the texts.
A general principle has been adopted by jurists that
'preventing harm takes priority over securing a benefit'. As such
means, if they lead to evil, these must be rejected. Authority for
Sadd al-Darai is also found in Sunnah. Prophet (SM) forbade a
creditor to take a gift from debtor (as it could lead to taking of
interest). He (SM) also forbade killing of hypocrites (as it could
lead to dissention within community, also lead to wrongful killing
on suspicion).
Despite the aforesiad, the Ulama of Usul are not in
agreement over Sadd al-Dharai. Some accept it, some do not accept
it. However, Shatibi is of the opinion that most Ulama have accepted
it in principle, they differ only in application. Abu Zahra is also
of the same opinion. (see textbook).
Dharai have been divided into the following four
types from the point of view of their probability of leading to evil
ends :
- Means which definitely lead to evil. Such means
are totally forbidden.
- Means which most likely to lead to evil and
rarely leads to benefit. Examples of this are selling weapons
during war time and selling grapes to a wine-maker. Most Ulama
have invalidated such means.
- Means which frequently lead to evil, but there is
no certainty or even dominant probability. Ulama differ widely on
the illegality of such means (see text book).
- Means which rarely lead to evil. Examples are
digging well in a place which is not likely to cause harm or
speaking a word of truth to a tyrannical ruler. Ulama have ruled
in favour of permissibility of these means.
Sadd al-Dharai should not be used too much,
particularly in the 3rd category stated above. Such use would render
the 'mubah' (lawful) and the 'mandub' (recommended) as unlawful, which can
not be accepted.
Ibnul Arabi and Abu Zahra are in favour of
moderation in its use. People of extremist tendencies can use sadd
al-Dharai to restrict human freedom granted by Allah and the
Prophet (SM) which must not be allowed to happen.
Hukm Sharii (Value of Shariah Rules): Hukm
Sharii is the communication from the lawgiver (Allah and the
Prophet (SM) on the authority of Allah) concerning the conduct of
Mukallaf (on whom law is applicable, that is, a sane and adult
person) which may be in the form of a demand or an option or only as
an enactment.
When the communication is made in the form of a
demand or option, the Hukm is called Al-Hukm al-taklifi (defining
law). If the communication is made in the form of an enactment only,
it is called Al-Hukm al-Wadi (declaratory law) [see explanation
below ].
Al-Hukm al-taklifi (defining law) may be in the
form of Fard, Wajib, Mandub, Mubah, Makruh and Haram. According to
majority, Fard and wazib are synonymous. If there is binding demand
from the lawgiver to do something, it is wazib. However, the
Hanafi's consider the demand Fard when both text and the meaning are
definitive (qati) and wazib when either the text or meaning is
speculative (Zanni - because Zanni is liable to interpretation of meaning or
investigation of authenticity). Difference between Fard and
Wazib has important consequence. Denial of binding nature of a
command established by definitive proof (Fard by Qati evidence)
leads to unbelief. However, denial of Wazib (according to Hanafi's)
or 2nd category of Fard (according to the majority) lead to
transgression (Fisq). Wazib has (and Fard) been variously classified
into the following:
- Wazib ayni (personal obligation of all Mukallaf)
and Wazib Kafai (collective obligation, performance of some of the
community would suffice).
- Wazib Muwaqqat (Wazib contingent on time-limit,
such as, Salah and Siam) and Wazib Mutlaq (absolute wazib which is
free from time-limit, such as, Hajj).
- Wazib Muhaddad (quantified Wazib, such as, Zakah
and Salah) and Wazib Ghair Muhaddad (unquantified Wazib, such as,
charity to poor, paying Mohr to wife).
A consequence of distinction between quantified
wazib and unquantified wazib is that quantified wazib becomes a
liability on the person who has not paid it in proper
time.
Mandub (recommended) denotes a demand not binding on
the Mukallaf. Compliance earns spiritual reward but no punishment is
inflicted for failure. This is the difference between Wazib and
Mandub. Examples of Mandub are creation of charitable endowment
(Waqf), giving alms to the poor and attending to sick. Mandub is also
called Sunnah, Nafl and Mustahab.
Sunnah (Mandub) has been clasified into
 (a) Emphatic sunnah (Sunnah al-Muakkadah) - Examples are adhan, attending
congregational prayer) and
 (b) Supererogatory Sunnah (Sunnah Ghair
al-Muakkadah) - Examples are Nafl prayers and non-obligatory charity.
Neglect of sunnah al-Muakkadah is blameworthy but not punishable.
Neglect of Sunnah Gair al-Muakkadah is neither blameworthy nor
punishable. Examples of Mandub in the Quran can be seen in verses
2:282, 24:3.
Haram (also known as Mahzur) is a binding demand of
lawgiver to abandon something. The level of proof required to
establish prohibition is the same as Fard (as explained by early
Hanafi Ulama) and of Wazib (as explained by the majority Ulama of
Usul).
The texual evidence for Haram may occur in various
forms such as:
- It may start with "Hurrimat alaykum" (forbidden
to you) [5:3]
- It may be conveyed in negative terms such as "la
taqtulu" (do not kill), "la takulu" (do not eat or take) [5:90; 2:188].
- It may be in the form of a command to avoid
(5:90, to avoid wine-drinking and gambling).
- It may be stated that it is not permissible (La
yahilla lakum, 4:19)
- Prohibition may be proved by punishment provided
for a conduct (Quran - verses on hadd penalties and also verses
mentioning punishment of fire in the hereafter).
Prohibition has also been classified into:
a) haram
li-dhatih (which is forbidden for its own sake such as wine, gambling) and
b) haram li-Ghayrih (which is forbidden for an
external reason, such as, marrying a woman only to make her legal for
another man) (tahlil).
Makruh is opposite of Mandub. It is preferable to
omit it than to commit it. Committing Makruh is not liable to
punishment or moral blame. This is the majority view. Hanafi's
divide Makruh into :
- Makruh Tanzihi and
- Makruh Tahrimi.
According to Hanafis, the commitment of Makruh
Tahrimi entails moral blame but not punishment. There are traditions
(Hadith) in which the word Kariha or its derivative has occurred.
These are the textual basis for Makruh.
Mubah (also termed halal and Jaiz) is a
communication of the lawgiver which gives option to the Mukallaf
(Quran 5:6; 2:235, 2:173). The Ulama of Usul include "Mubah"
under Hukm Shari although including it under al-Hukm al-Taklifi is
on the basis of probability as there is basically no
liability.
Al-Hukm al-wadi (declaratory law) enacts something
as a cause (sabab), a condition (shart) or a hindrance (Mani) to the
defining law. An explicit example is the hadith which says, "there is
no 'nikah' without two witnesses". Thus the presence of witnesses has
been made a condition of a valid marriage. Another example is the
hadith, "there shall be no bequest to an heir" which enacts a
hindrance (ma'ni) to bequest (wasiah).
Declaratory law is divided into
- cause,
- condition,
- hindrance,
- Azimah, and
- Rukhsha.
Azimah is the law as the lawgiver had intended in
the first place without any softening for any reason (example: all
Ibadah in normal circumstances). A law is a Rukhsah when the law
embodies the exception to take care of difficulties (example is
granting concession to traveller to break fast).
Rukhsah may occur
- in the form of permitting a prohibited thing on
the ground of necessity,
- omitting a Wazib when conformity to wazib causes
hardship (example is the provision for traveller to shorten salah
or not to observe fast during Ramadan) and
- in the form of validating contracts which would
normally be disallowed (for example, advance sale [salam] and
order for the manufacture of goods [Istisnah], though the goods
are non-existent).
There is another kind of Shariah values called,
- Sahih (valid),
- Fasid (irregular), and
- Batil (void).
The classification is
made on the basis of compliance with essential requirements (arkam)
and conditions (shurut) of Ahkam. When all these are fulfilled, the
act is valid or sahih. If these are not fulfilled, the act is void
or Batil.
The Ulama are in agreement that Ibadah can only be
sahih or batil. In the matter of transactions also, the majority
hold the same view. However, the Hanafis have validated an
intermediate category in transactions called Fasid (irregular, not
Batil) when there is some deficiency in the Shart (condition). If
the deficiency is made up, it becomes Sahih.
The pillars of Hukm Shari are -
- Hakim or lawgiver,
- Mahkum Fih or subject matter,
- Mahkum Alayh, i.e., on whom law is
applied.
The source of all law in Islam is ultimately Allah
(6:57; 5:45). Mahkum Fih denotes the acts, obligations of the
Mukallaf which may be in the form of Wazib, Mandub or Mubah. Mahkum
Alayh deals with the legal capacity of the individuals or bear the
rights and obligations imposed by Shariah.
A person acquires active legal capacity when he
attains a certain level of intellectual maturity and competence.
Active legal capacity is only partial in case of a child (because of
age) and in case of a person in death bed.
Hukm Shari has also been classified
into
- Haqq-al-Allah and
- Haqq-al-Ibad.
Haqq-al-Allah or the rights of Allah is so called
not because Allah benefits from them but because these are
beneficial for the community at large. In other words, these are
public rights. Worship, Hadud, Uqubah (minor punishments), Kaffarah,
Jihad, etc. are within rights of Allah.